IB Diploma DP2 / Physics / Curriculum
HL extensions and synthesis: structured theory, worked examples, answered practice, and a mastery checklist for IB Diploma DP2.
CHAPTER PLAN
Follow the steps in order or jump directly to the part you need.
—/5
completed
Estimated active study time
209 minutes
Objectives, key ideas, and structured theory.
Open →Worked examples that explain every step.
Open →Graded tasks with hints and answer guidance.
Open →Assignments from core work to challenge.
Open →A timed, marked test with solution guidance.
Open →Progress is stored only in this browser and does not require AI credits.
Unit
The essential chapter ideas in a clear sequence before practice.
Modern physics uses models tested by spectra, scattering, decays, and detectors. Distinguish an observation from its interpretation.
A single nuclear decay is random, but large samples follow predictable laws. Use half-life or an exponential relation with the correct scale.
In atomic and nuclear processes, check energy, momentum, charge, and particle numbers where applicable. Do not mix eV and J without conversion.
For “HL mechanics depth”, start from an observation or model, define quantities and units where relevant, and separate the changed factor from the measured outcome. Support the conclusion with data and state the test's limitations.
For “HL thermodynamics depth”, start from an observation or model, define quantities and units where relevant, and separate the changed factor from the measured outcome. Support the conclusion with data and state the test's limitations.
For “HL waves depth”, start from an observation or model, define quantities and units where relevant, and separate the changed factor from the measured outcome. Support the conclusion with data and state the test's limitations.
For “HL fields depth”, start from an observation or model, define quantities and units where relevant, and separate the changed factor from the measured outcome. Support the conclusion with data and state the test's limitations.
For “HL quantum/nuclear depth”, start from an observation or model, define quantities and units where relevant, and separate the changed factor from the measured outcome. Support the conclusion with data and state the test's limitations.
Physics
Follow the method step by step and check why every step is valid.
A sample starts with 640 active nuclei and 3 half-lives pass. How many are expected?
N = 80
Before calculating, explain the key idea from “HL mechanics depth” and which conditions must be checked.
The answer should show not only which rule is used for “HL mechanics depth”, but also why it is valid here.
HL extensions and synthesis
Eight graded tasks from core fluency to exam-style application. Work independently before opening a hint or answer.
A sample starts with 168 nuclei. How many are expected after three half-lives?
Halve three times.
21.
Structure a solution for “HL thermodynamics depth”: givens, SI units, law, substitution, and interpretation.
State the law before substituting numbers.
A full solution states symbols/units, selects a valid law for “HL thermodynamics depth”, shows substitution and calculation, and interprets the result.
Identify three uncertainty sources in measuring “HL waves depth” and improve each one.
Consider instrument resolution, reaction time, repeats, and controls.
A full response links each specific error source to a targeted improvement and identifies random or systematic impact.
Plan a suitable graph for “HL fields depth” data and explain how to obtain a gradient or relationship.
Put the independent variable on x and dependent variable on y.
A full response labels axes/units, uses a suitable scale and best fit; gradient uses a large triangle and is interpreted with units.
Check whether a result for “HL quantum/nuclear depth” is sensible using units, order of magnitude, and a limiting case.
A check should not merely repeat the same calculation.
A full check confirms dimensions/units, compares expected magnitude, and tests behaviour when one variable becomes very small or large.
Connect “Multi-step problem solving” to energy conservation or a force/field model and justify the choice.
Define the system and interactions.
A full response defines the system, describes transfer or interaction, applies the appropriate model, and states losses or limitations.
Write a multi-step exam response about “Mathematical modelling” with calculation and evaluation.
Separate givens, model, calculation, result, and evaluation.
A full response includes an appropriate diagram/model, laws, algebraic rearrangement, SI substitution, suitably precise result, and evaluation of assumptions.
Compare two methods for investigating “HL mechanics depth” and select the more reliable using criteria.
Use accuracy, repeatability, control, and safety.
The choice must use at least three comparable criteria and acknowledge one trade-off or limitation.
HL extensions and synthesis
Six distinct assignments from core fluency to challenge, each with an estimated time, hint, and answer guide.
Homework 1: A sample starts with 96 nuclei. How many are expected after three half-lives?
Halve three times.
12.
Homework 2: Structure a solution for “HL thermodynamics depth”: givens, SI units, law, substitution, and interpretation.
State the law before substituting numbers.
A full solution states symbols/units, selects a valid law for “HL thermodynamics depth”, shows substitution and calculation, and interprets the result.
Homework 3: Identify three uncertainty sources in measuring “HL waves depth” and improve each one.
Consider instrument resolution, reaction time, repeats, and controls.
A full response links each specific error source to a targeted improvement and identifies random or systematic impact.
Homework 4: Plan a suitable graph for “HL fields depth” data and explain how to obtain a gradient or relationship.
Put the independent variable on x and dependent variable on y.
A full response labels axes/units, uses a suitable scale and best fit; gradient uses a large triangle and is interpreted with units.
Homework 5: Check whether a result for “HL quantum/nuclear depth” is sensible using units, order of magnitude, and a limiting case.
A check should not merely repeat the same calculation.
A full check confirms dimensions/units, compares expected magnitude, and tests behaviour when one variable becomes very small or large.
Homework 6: Connect “Multi-step problem solving” to energy conservation or a force/field model and justify the choice.
Define the system and interactions.
A full response defines the system, describes transfer or interaction, applies the appropriate model, and states losses or limitations.
50 minutes / 40 marks
A timed, full-mark self-assessment with model-answer guidance.
Start the timer when ready, work without notes, show every step, and open model answers only after finishing.
1. A sample starts with 256 nuclei. How many are expected after three half-lives?
2 marks32.
2. Structure a solution for “HL thermodynamics depth”: givens, SI units, law, substitution, and interpretation.
3 marksA full solution states symbols/units, selects a valid law for “HL thermodynamics depth”, shows substitution and calculation, and interprets the result.
3. Identify three uncertainty sources in measuring “HL waves depth” and improve each one.
3 marksA full response links each specific error source to a targeted improvement and identifies random or systematic impact.
4. Plan a suitable graph for “HL fields depth” data and explain how to obtain a gradient or relationship.
4 marksA full response labels axes/units, uses a suitable scale and best fit; gradient uses a large triangle and is interpreted with units.
5. Check whether a result for “HL quantum/nuclear depth” is sensible using units, order of magnitude, and a limiting case.
4 marksA full check confirms dimensions/units, compares expected magnitude, and tests behaviour when one variable becomes very small or large.
6. Connect “Multi-step problem solving” to energy conservation or a force/field model and justify the choice.
4 marksA full response defines the system, describes transfer or interaction, applies the appropriate model, and states losses or limitations.
7. Write a multi-step exam response about “Mathematical modelling” with calculation and evaluation.
5 marksA full response includes an appropriate diagram/model, laws, algebraic rearrangement, SI substitution, suitably precise result, and evaluation of assumptions.
8. Compare two methods for investigating “HL mechanics depth” and select the more reliable using criteria.
5 marksThe choice must use at least three comparable criteria and acknowledge one trade-off or limitation.
9. Create an extension question about “HL thermodynamics depth”, a prediction, and a data-collection plan.
5 marksA full response gives a testable question, justified prediction, independent-variable range, repeats, and an analysis method.
10. A sample starts with 112 nuclei. How many are expected after three half-lives?
5 marks14.
Unit
Curriculum reference sources. Always confirm the teaching sequence with the school and tutor.
Physics
Link each topic to equations, units, data handling, and required practical thinking.
The structure follows the official textbook layout and is used to organise study.
The areas that usually create mistakes or need extra revision.
Where to start: textbook, daily material, PDFs, videos, and worked examples.
Targeted practice before full tests so coverage is clear.
How to measure progress in this chapter and when it enters a cumulative mock.
What to do after finishing the chapter and how it connects to the next unit.
Note: for the official examinable syllabus of each school year, always confirm with the school, tutor, and current Ministry/IEP announcements.
